This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

UCC28950: UCC28950 Rsum calculation

Part Number: UCC28950

Would you help to figure out why calculation in equation (169) is ~7mV/us?

Directly plugging 400*47/2.76/10^-3/100 = ~70mV/us and not sure why ~7mV/us instead.

BR Gary

  • Hello,

    The calculation gives V/s to convert to V/us you need to convert it to us.

    1000us=1s

    Multiply your answer by 1s/1000us and you will get 68mV/us which is roughly 70 mV us. 

    You are correct that this is a typo in the data sheet.  I will make a note of it and report to the data sheet team.

    Regards,

  • Hi Mike,

    If Equ. 169 is 70mV/us, then the Equ. 170 become a negative value (67-70)=-3mV/us. So that Equ. 171 also become a negative resistance 2.5/(0.5x-3x0.001)=-1.7kohm.

    May I know how to design this negative resistance?

    In addition, may I know its reasonable for the Equ. 170 become a negative?

    BR Gary

  • Hello,

    That would indicate the magnetizing inductance added enough slope compensation and none is needed.  In that case I would still add 100 to 200 mV of slope compensation just to ensure at light load the PWM comparator had a signal to control to because the CS signal is so small at light loads.

    Regards,

  • Hi Mike

    So you means in this condition you still will added the 100ms to 200ms in ME value.

    and I can said the Equ170 will be 167ms/267ms - 70ms = 97ms/197ms , right ?

    the the Equ171 will become the 51.546k / 25.38k. Am I correct ?

    If not , please direct correct me. Thanks!

    Eddie

  • mV not mS and yest.