This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
The simulation results and the excel sheet design is attached here. Please go through the attachment.
Hello,
Your inquiry is under review and I will get back to you shortly.
Regards,
Hi Mike,
I tried with both Start_up model and Steady_State model. These results are shown in the below figures. In both case output voltage is not regulated at required nominal voltage of 52V.
Start_Up model simulation:
Steady_State model imulation:
...
Hello,
I reviewed your schematic and you used a transformer turns ratio of 5. The tool recommended 4.4. I wonder if you are running into a turns ratio limitation. Could you change your transformer turns ratio and try running the simulation to see if it fixes the issue.
Regards,
Hi, Mike
I have verified the simulation, schematic with excel design sheet. The transformer turns ratio is 5 only, even though the output voltage is not regulated at required value. I have attached the Excel design sheet, PSPICE simulation results and Simulation file. Please once again go through it.
Do the needful.
Hello,
I modified the transient simulation and evaluated the transformer LS input to the design. I have attached the modified design file for your reference. The primary turns ratio was changed to 5 similar to your design.
I reran the simulation and evaluated the voltage across the H Bridge and transformer.
I zoomed in on the voltage across the primary of T2 and the voltage across the H Bridge output (L2+T2 primary).
The voltage applied across L2 and T2 primary was 410 V and the voltage across T2 was 239V. The voltage is being divided down when it should not be.
L2 = 26 uH, while the Lm of the transformer is 2.6 mH, with LLeak of 7.5 uH. Even if there were and inductance divider this voltage would be 410V*2.6m/(2.6m+33.5uH) = 404.8 V roughly.
There appears to be something wrong with this model and I am going to move it to the TI PSpice forum for further support.
Regards,
Hi Mike,
I've seen this once before. We didn't find a solution then.
I'll post this to Cadence as this is a component that they provide to see if they have a solution.
David
Hi Sugali,
Did you build the transformer following the app note by Cadence?Transformer Design_AppNote.pdf
Hi David,
The already available transformer model (in TI PSPICE_UCC28950) is used here.
Thanks. I've shared the design file with Cadence. Let's see what they say about this not simulating correctly.
David
Hi David,
Thanks. Please go through this new design for 3.3kW PSFB DC/DC converter.
HI Sugali
As the issue appears to be the transformer, let's see what Cadence says about it. Any resolution there should apply to the revised design.
David
Hi Sugali,
Can you archive the project and post that here. We need more than the DSN.
From capture, go to File->Archive Project and selet all the options to create a single archive file.
David
Hi David,
Thank you for your response. Here i'm attaching the Archive Project file.
Please find the attachment.
Thank you.
Harinaik
I've submitted it. I had to delete the .dat file as it was taking a lot of space.
Hi David,
Any updates regarding 3.3kW DC/DC converter (UCC28950/UCC28951) TI_PSPICE simulation model.
We are going to make a 3.3KW charger with interleaved PFC + PSFB (DC/DC) topology. It is very important project for us and I kindly request you, please solve this issue as early as possible.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Harinaik
Hi Harinaik,
I've pinged Cadence about this. Let's see what they say.
David
Hi Harinaik,
I referred this to Cadence as they own the transfomer model.
THey are unable to reproduce the problem.
Per their correspondence:
As described in the problem statement that the voltage across T2 was 239.
I checked it at my end and it does not seem to be 239 rather it is 400V which is expected as per the calculations shared by you.
Below are the snapshots for your reference, let me know if i misunderstood anything and we can have a call to discuss it further. I probed the voltage across T2 primary and the result is
Cursor measurement for T2 primary is 400 as below
We might need to arrange a call to resolve the source of the difference.
Please let me know of your availability,
David
Hi David,
Thank you for your response.
Up to 28/03/2024 and after 03/04/2024 only I'm will be available.
If you don't have any other commitments, Tomorrow we can arrange a call.
Thank you
Harinaik