This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello,
We consider to use UCD90160 and UCD90240 devices as power supply controller, particularly sequencing and adjusting voltages power rails (with PTH08T250WAD power module) . The devices will be used to adjust power module voltage in closed-loop manner.
I would like to confirm the following question:
1. We have in our system outputs Sense+ and Sense- for 0.95V rail, which have to be monitored for closed-loop.
a. Do you have any proved of-the-shelf solution for monitoring differential signals w/ mentioned above parts? If yes please provide the suggested solution.
b. If the answer to previous question is "no" , Could you propose the part that can sense/monitor differential sense input?
c. What is the margining mode BW and how one can ensure stability of two control loops (one of power module and second UCD90*)?
2. Except extra pins of UCD90240 (vs. UCD90160) is there any other conceptual difference?
Thank you very much,
Igal
1. The margining signal must be connected to the FB pin of the controller, after the resistor divider. If there is resistor divider between Sense+/- pins and the FB pin (very likely that way, since the output voltage can go up to 3.6V), the margining method will not work.
2. UCD90240 is based on the same concept and has the same behavior as UCD90160, with enhanced functions, such as more rails, more fault logs, support of GPI fault to shutdown rails, configure monitor pins as voltage/current/temperature, etc.
Hi,
We still need your help.
We expect from TI, as manufacturer of both devices (UCD90xxx and PTH08T250WAD), clear Yes/No answer if the devices are compatible for "Closed-loop margin PWM" operation.
If the answer is "yes", please provide with corresponding required interconnection, methodology, calculation.
Appreciate your help.
Thank you,
Igal