Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM5069,
I saw the previous post asking about reverse polarity protection with the TPS2492 and the response suggesting use of the LM5069 instead. Is there a fundamental reason the TPS2492 cannot be configured in the same way as the LM5069 to prevent reverse polarity? I want to use the TPS2492 because it has lower quiescent current, analog current sensing, and a stronger gate pull-down current in the case of a hard short, but I'd like to know if that choice means I will not be able to do reverse polarity protection.