This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello,
I have a customer who has seen this:
Calibration (Data section) offset:
We found a gap between the calibration offsets values as listed in the old datasheet comparing to the new datasheet.
As we see in the listed datasheet snapshots, there is a shift in the calibration fields starting from offset 24. For example, in the new datasheet, ‘cc offset’ is located at offset 26 while according to the old datasheet it is located at offset 24.
In our implementation only “CC offset” and “board offset” are affected (zero values of other fields)
Field 104:24 = 0x00 // Board Offset
Field 104:25 = 0x00 // Board Offset
Field 104:26 = 0x59 // CC Offset
Field 104:27 = 0x0c // CC Offset
Field 104:28 = 0x00
Field 104:29 = 0x00
Field 104:30 = 0x00
We can see that offset 26-27 (cc offset) is not zero as it should be but has the value of 'board offset'.
(1) Can you please explain where does this gap came from ?
(2) Can you please describe what is the impact of mixing between CC and Board offset ?
(3) Up to how many Bytes is they size of the volatile and non-volatile memory?
They are using:
1- The bqEVSW tool version is : 0.9.92.
2- The firmware version is : 0x0015 – reading the firmware version via ManufacturerAccess register using command 0x2 as it mentioned in the BQ datasheet.
Could you please help answer the bolded questioned?
Hello Bryan,
I believe there has been a misunderstanding:
Thank you,
John Louie