This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

BQ34Z100-G1: BQ34Z100-G1 Calibration for 3 Cell Lithium Titanite Battery

Part Number: BQ34Z100-G1

Hello,

I am trying to configure my BQ34Z100-G1 for my specific Lithium Titanite Battery. I am going through your datasheet's instructions for obtaining a ChemID and for using the Impedance Track algorithm to properly configure my fuel gauge monitor, but I am running into a few roadblocks. These roadblocks mainly have to do with the fact that this battery type isnt very common and it has three 2.4V series cells (rather than two 3.6V series cells).

I measured and recorded a charge-relaxation-discharge-relaxation curve for my battery but was not able to achieve a proper ChemID (Standard Deviation was 100%). Mainly because of the 3 series cells. When I change the config.txt to have 2 series cells, I managed to obtain the ChemID of 3353 but this doesn't inspire much confidence as I will need to use that ChemID when I proceed onto the Impedance Track measurements. This is where I would appreciate some guidance. (1) Would it be appropriate to make a new ChemID on TI's database or could I get away with using a 2 cell battery?  Alternatively, my team has used the ChemIDs from other 2 cell batteries simply based on their low temperature characteristics. 

(2) In addition to this, assuming I use a 2 cell battery's ChemID, I believe I should be able to configure the data memory for a 3 cell battery prior to doing the impedance track testing and still get useful calibration values. Is that correct?

Battery info here:

  • HTC1865 3S10P (3 Series, 10 Parallel)
  • In the post below, it is stated that it should be possible to use this chipset but this is in regards to a 2 cell battery: 

https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management/f/196/t/959560  

Thank you,

Andrew

  • Hello Andrew,

    It looks like the other e2e linked had a max charge voltage closer to some cells we have characterized, since this chemistry has a strange max charge voltage it most likely won't fit with any of our chemIDs. Since we don't support this chemistry I can't give you much info on accuracy, if you program 2S instead of 3S it may work if you got a chem ID match for 2S with your 3S system.

    If you find the chemID by setting it to 2S you should keep the gauge programmed for 2S as well.

    Sincerely,

    Wyatt Keller