Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS2373
Hi
TPS2372.pdfhttps://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/196/TPS2372.7z
Please help to review the schematic and layout.
Thank you very much.
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi
TPS2372.pdfhttps://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/196/TPS2372.7z
Please help to review the schematic and layout.
Thank you very much.
Hi Thomas,
Thank you for your reply.
Could you kindly help to check the layout?
Hi User,
I will certainly check layout. I noticed you posted a separate thread for the same design (e2e.ti.com/.../780206), so I will paste your question below & address in this thread.
Regards,
Tom Amlee
PoE PD Apps Engineer
"For this design, we concern that:
1) The increase of current through each optocoupler’s LED to a minimum of 3mA at the lowest input voltage.
- Concern about the increase in system power dissipation due to the increase in optocoupler LED current for PD17, PD32, PD33 and PD13, PD15, PD16.
- The TPS2372 datasheet’s recommended operating conditions for TPH, TPL and BT sinking current is 3 mA maximum (10 mA absolute max).
Unlike the TPS2373, the TPS2372 does not have a low voltage output to power the opto LEDs. But it may be possible to use the MAX5974D_VC_PD voltage that is developed from the tertiary winding of the power transformer (T3) for the PWM controller (PU11). The voltage at MAX5974D_VC_PD will remain somewhat constant over the 42.5 to 57V input range, and its value will be much lower. Therefore it would be possible to provide 3 mA to each opto LED without the large increase in system power dissipation.
Could you help to check this design is ok or not?"
Hi User,
Regarding the note about the optocoupler pullup: I did not see that the output of the bias winding & the series linear regulator were the same net. That should be fine.
My only comment on layout is to be sure that the ground return path from PC112/PC124 to the terminations of the current sense resistors PR144/PR71 is as short as possible. Overall, the major power paths are tight & well optimized.
Thanks,
Tom Amlee
PoE PD Apps Engineer