This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TDA4VM: Recommendation for SAMPLEDELAY to charge the AFE capacitance during the acquisition period

Part Number: TDA4VM

Hi Kevin,

In the referenced E2E post https://e2e.ti.com/support/processors-group/processors/f/processors-forum/1096609/tda4vm-what-s-the-input-impedance-of-adc-port-of-tda4vmyou state the following:

But here is the key point: the 1K resistance and the 5.5pF (+ parasitic capacitances) creates an RC time constant of 5.5ns. You always need 9 or 10 time constants to charge to a 12-bit accuracy level.

Is this relationship between RC time constant and the time it takes to charge to a particular accuracy level (9-10 time constants for 12 bit accuracy) specific to the TI ADC design or is this ADC design in general? Can you point me to any further collateral on this relationship?

Thanks,

Jelena

  • Rephrasing the earlier question and adding a second one: 

    The referred post mentions 9-10 RC constants needed to charge to 12-bit accuracy level (the specific example had 5.5ns RC constant and the recommendation was to setup SAMPLEDELAY to give 55ns before sampling). 

    1. Is the need for "9-10 time constants to charge to 12-bit accuracy" documented somewhere other than the E2E as a recommendation for the choice of SAMPLEDELAY?

    2. Does this recommendation for SAMPLEDELAY change if sample averaging is used (i.e. is 55ns still needed if the input is sampled and averaged 16 times)?

    Thanks,

    Jelena

  • Jelena,

    9 or 10 time constants is generic.

    You want the voltage to be sampled to 1/2 LSB which is 1/8192 for a 12-bit ADC.

    Since the RC charging is exponential, you need exp(-9.01) to get to a 1/2 LSB level.

    Kevin

  • Hi Kevin,

    Thank you for your response. 

    Can you also address question #2 from Jelena? 

    Thanks,

    Jeff

  • Jeff, Jelena,

    It is absolutely true that averaging will keep re-sampling the same voltage many times and therefore create a long sampling time; however, the first  (or first few) conversions are not improved by this method.

    Kevin