As I see, TI's PSP are based on http://arago-project.org/git/projects/
For example http://arago-project.org/git/projects/x-load-omap3.git and http://arago-project.org/git/projects/u-boot-omap3.git
But projects "Das U-BOOT" and "X-Load" have their own repositories. X-load located at http://gitorious.org/ x-load-omap3 , u-boot located at http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-ti.git;a=summary
I need splashscreen support at my AM3517EVM, and it seems that splashscreen based on u-boot-ti.git require less effort because of DSS support in u-boot (see http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-ti.git;a=commit;h=de701d118380de12a48c8a4fb345e9f909329432 )
Last synchronization between arago and denx was done 2010-06-17 (see http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=u-boot-omap3.git;a=commit;h=530135dcacac278798346ad5825c03131ce51772 ) and it is too late.
Two repositories http://arago-project.org/git/projects/u-boot-omap3.git and http://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti.git have realization of non-overlapping new features. This way, u-boot at arago doesn't has changes from 2010-06-17 which was made in denx u-boot such as advanced memcpy(), memset(), DSS support, directory moved arch/arm/cpu/cortexa8 to armv7 etc.
I see Vaibhav Hiremath making changes to both repositories, and want to understand the difference between repositories. Thus, TI suppose both repositories.
As I suppose:
1. one day arago u-boot will have synchronization with denx u-boot, and DSS support will be done in next TI's PSP. Is it right?
2. I don't know how changes from arago u-boot will be copied to denx u-boot. Manually by TI engineers? How often?
3. What for there are two u-boot repositories for one big task? http://arago-project.org/git/projects/u-boot-omap3.git and http://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti.git