Other Parts Discussed in Thread: MATHLIB, FFTLIB
Migrating customer from C6678 to AM69.
Is there any standard benchmarking data for for C7x DSP vs C66x?
- Such as Dhrystone, or other DSP benchmarking standards
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi Eddie,
For performance data, we have provided cycle counts for various kernels we have optimized for C66x and C7x.
In the 9.2 RTOS SDK for J721E you can find various libraries for C66x optimized kernels, which also have performance data. I will point out a few relevant documents below:
Included in ti-processor-sdk-rtos-j721e-evm-09_02_00_05:
C66x
In the 9.2 RTOS SDK for J784S4 you can find various libraries for C7x optimized kernels, which have performance data. I will point out a few relevant documents below:
Included in ti-processor-sdk-rtos-j784s4-evm-09_02_00_05:
C71x
The following two don't have C66x equivalents since many of the functions (in the case of FFTLIB) and all the functions (in the case of MMALIB) utilize the MMA which is unique to the C7x architecture, but including them below for your reference:
You can compare the performance between the same function implemented on the C66x vs C71x architectures with data from DSPLIB, MATHLIB, and VXLIB.
Best,
Asha