question about message queue

1330hayacool7102

Hi Badri,

I have seen following messages with warning info. After tracing, I found that it will make waitAck=TRUE when showing following.
Will it have any side effect or something wrong when waitAck=FALSE? Can I ignore the info?

[c6xdsp ] 68814: MSGQ: WARNING: Trying to send command [0x0002] to link [63] on processor [HOST], with waitAck FALSE !!!
...
[m3video] 70333: MSGQ: WARNING: Trying to send command [0x7145] to link [63] on processor [HOST], with waitAck FALSE !!!
...
1877679: MSGQ: WARNING: Trying to send command [0x0004] to link [34] on processor [VIDEO-M3], with waitAck FALSE !!!

over 12 years ago

0 Badri Narayanan over 12 years ago

TI__Guru 59700 points

It has no side effect. After applying Msgq patch it will internally force waitAck = TRUE and this warning just shows that some msgs are being sent with waitAck = FALSE

0 1330hayacool7102 over 12 years ago in reply to Badri Narayanan

Guru 10655 points

Hi badri,

By checking, it seems waitAck is always equal to TRUE, does it mean the "waitAck = FALSE" isn't supported?

Processors

Processors forum

question about message queue