This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Generating Keystone SDRAM VTT REF

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS51200

On the C6678 eval platform, the VTT reference is produced from a voltage divider and fed to VTTREF inputs on SDRAMs and controller. A seperate divider is used to feed the TPS51200 REF input.

The C6657 platform is a bit different in that a single divider feeds everything.

Given required tolerances, wouldn't a better approach be to use a single voltage divider to feed the TPS51200 REF input, and use the device's REF output to feed VTTREF inputs on SDRAMs and controller?

  • David,

    We are in the process of updating the Hardware Design Guide. The new version currently includes the following sections:

    2.2.5.1 VTT Termination Supply

    The DDR3 interface requires a VTT termination at the end of the flyby chain for the DDR3 address and control signals. The 0.75V termination voltage is generated using a special push/pull termination regulator specifically designed to meet the VTT requirements for DDR3. The Texas Instruments TPS51200 is one device that meets these requirements. Although the VTT supply is not connected to the KeyStone I devices it is necessary for the DDR3 interface connected to the device.

     

    2.2.5.2 VREF Supply

    The C66x device requires a 0.75V reference voltage for the DDR3 SDRAM interface connected to the VREFSSTL pin. Many VTT termination supplies will provide a separate supply output pin specifically for a reference voltage. This is true for the TPS51200 which provides the reference voltage on the REFOUT pin. If the reference voltage is provided by the VTT termination supply, it should be connected to the VREFSSTL pin. If it is not supplied, a simple voltage divider as illustrated in Figure 4 can be used. All resistive components must be 1% or better tolerance. The components in the following figure must be placed close to the respective device pin. If a resistor divider is used the VREFSSTL source voltage MUST be generated from the same supply as the DRAM interface to the device (DVDD15). Both must track in parallel as the supply voltage fluctuates.

    Does this help? Does it address your concerns?

    Regards,
    RandyP

  • Thanks for the response, Randy.

    I'm a bit confused by: "The components in the following figure must be placed close to the respective device pin."

    The VREFSSTL net would need to feed pins on the Keystone device, all SDRAMs, and the VREF input on the TPS51200 (needed to generate VTT by tracking DVDD15). On both eval platforms I originally mentioned, VREFSSTL is a long copper route with the voltage divider located at one end of the net near the first SDRAM.

    I don't know how to reconcile the above statement with the fact that the VREFSSTL net essentially needs connect to several devices.

    This also leads to the obvious question...which is the best topology:

    1. Use REFOUT pin on TPS51200 to feed VREF inputs on SDRAMs and Keystone; voltage divider only feeds TPS51200 REFIN (used on neither TI eval platform but implemented on other non-TI eval platforms).

    2. Use a separate voltage divider for a) TPS51200 REFIN input and b) VREF inputs on other devices (C6678 eval platform).

    3. Use a single voltage divider to feed everything (C6657 eval platform).


  • Hi David,

    I'm sorry for the confusion. The routing of the reference voltage should be treated like a lower current voltage rail. The voltage should be sourced by either a REFOUT from a VTT power supply component or by a voltage divider between the DVDD15 and ground. This source should be routed to each of the reference voltage inputs for both the SOC and for the SDRAM devices. Wide traces should be used to minimize the voltage drop across the route and ideally a bypass capacitor should be placed close to each of the destination pins. 

    I will update the documentation to clarify this.

    Regards, Bill