• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 98 subscribers
  • Views 331 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

OMAP-L138 - Naming convention for EMAC signals

Milan Zelenka
Intellectual 870 points
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OMAP-L138, OMAPL138

Hello,
OMAP-L138 datasheet appears to be rather inconsistent in terms of EMAC signals.

Example:
MDIO_CLK  vs MDCLK
MDIO_D      vs MDIO

May I ask you to take approriate measures towards fixing the problem?

Many thanks,
Milan Zelenka

  • 0
    TI__Mastermind 20790 points

    Milan Zelenka,

    Thanks for your notification about the MDIO pins(signal name) in the OMAL138 datasheet.
    I also verified both the OMAPL138 datasheet and TRM.
    Yes,It will confuse the MDIO naming used bit different at some point.
    I would like to inform about MDIO pin signal naming.
    Management data clock (MDIO_CLK) is equivalent to MDCLK
    Management data input output (MDIO_D) is equivalent to MDIO

    I will inform to EMAC team about the MDIO signal naming correction.

  • 0 in reply to Pubesh
    Intellectual 870 points

    Thanks Pubesh.
    Let's consider this SR closed.