Are these libraries MIT licenses?

shigehiro tsuda

Hi,

In following manifest, libc6 and libgcc-s1 are it in mention of the "MIT" license, is it true?
Generally, libc6 seems to become LGPLv2.
Because only a binary is available not a source, I cannot judge it what kind of licensed one it is.
Please tell me the way of the judgment of the license or the acquisition of the source. if possible

http://software-dl.ti.com/sitara_linux/esd/AM437xSDK/latest/exports/software_manifest.html

Best Regards,

Shigehiro Tsuda

over 10 years ago

0 Ivan Matrakov over 10 years ago

TI__Expert 4475 points

Hi Shigehiro,

I'll forward this question to the company experts.

BR
Ivan

0 Franklin Cooper over 10 years ago in reply to Ivan Matrakov

TI__Intellectual 2020 points

So the license is a bit miss leading.

Those libraries and a bunch of other toolchain libraries are provided by the prebuilt linaro toolchain. The binaries from the toolchain are copied and reused in various parts of the SDK.

The overall license for the the toolchain would be GPLv2 & GPLv3 & LGPLv2 & LGPLv3. This license would also be used for any library/binary that are apart of that toolchain. This includes libc6 and libgcc.

0 shigehiro tsuda over 10 years ago in reply to Franklin Cooper

Mastermind 9490 points

Hi Franklin,

Thank you for quick reply.

I could understand that the description of the license of these libraries was wrong.

I could understand that these libraries are linaro toolchain libraries and the license would be GPL and LGPL.

Thank you very mach !

Best regards,

shigehiro tsuda

Processors

Processors forum

Are these libraries MIT licenses?