• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 98 subscribers
  • Views 397 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Differences between AM3703CBP100 and AM3703CUS100

Nomo
Guru 16800 points

Hello,

Is there any hardware migration guide from AM3703CBP100 to AM3703CUS100?
Some function pins cannot be used by changing from AM3703CBP100 to AM3703CUS100.
I will check the datasheet; however I want to avoid a misunderstanding.

Best Regards,

Nomoto

  • 0
    TI__Guru 65405 points

    Hi Nomoto,

    There is no hardware migration guide from AM3703CBP100 to AM3703CUS100 but you should consider the differences between both packages described in the datasheet:
    www.ti.com/.../am3703.pdf
    CBP Suffix - 515-pin s-PBGA package, 0.5mm Ball Pitch (Top), 0.4mm Ball Pitch (Bottom)
    CUS Suffix - 423-pin s-PBGA package, 0.65mm Ball Pitch

    BR
    Tsvetolin Shulev

  • 0 in reply to Cvetolin Shulev-XID
    Guru 16800 points

    Hello,

    Thank you for your reply and I can understand there is no hardware migration guide from AM3703CBP100 to AM3703CUS100.
    I have a question.
    Please let me know whether differences between AM3703CBP100 and AM3703CUS100 are only pin mux and placement.
    I expect the internal functions are identical; for example, each macro function, register map, and so on.

    Best Regards,

    Nomoto

  • 0 in reply to Nomo
    TI__Guru 65405 points
    Nomoto,

    Both processors (AM3703CBP100 and AM3703CUS100) are identical as internal functions and as register map. The difference is only in the form factor and pin mux.

    BR
    Tsvetolin Shulev