• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 98 subscribers
  • Views 271 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Workmanship of TMS320C6678

user4120002
Prodigy 30 points
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMS320C6678

Hello everyone !

   The power consumption of  TMS320C6678 is high. TMS320C6678 made by better workmanship has lower power consumption, isn't it ?  All TMS320C6678 made by 40nm workmanship?  I want to a kind of TMS320C6678 with lower power consumption .

   Thank you.

  • 0
    TI__Guru* 81335 points

    Welcome to the TI E2E forum. I hope you will find many good answers here and in the TI.com documents and in the TI Wiki Pages (for processor issues). Be sure to search those for helpful information and to browse for the questions others may have asked on similar topics (e2e.ti.com). Please read all the links below my signature.

    Can you please elaborate your query? Have you checked the power consumption model (under Models section )of C6678 (below link)?

    Note: We strongly recommend you to create new e2e thread for your queries instead of following up on an old/closed e2e thread, new threads gets more attention than old threads and can provide link of old threads or information on the new post for clarity and faster response.

  • 0 in reply to Raja
    Prodigy 30 points
    Hello Raja,
    Thank you for you answer.I have checked the model of power comsumption.But I want to know the information about craft of C6678 concerned with power consumption not the power consumption of every parts inside C6678. All the C6678 made by 40nm techology?
    Regards
    Zhang T
  • 0
    TI__Guru* 83745 points

    Hi 

    Yes c6678 is in 40 nm process w/ focus on high performance. 

    It does have a very good performance/ Watt ratio for its class of device. 

    If you are looking for lower power -  I think it would be good if you could elaborate further on your end application, number of DSP/ARM cores needed , and the power/performance targets you are trying to achieve etc.

    Regards

    Mukul 

  • 0 in reply to Mukul Bhatnagar
    Prodigy 30 points
    Hello Mukul Bhatnagar
    Thank you for your answer.
    Regards