Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CDCM9102
Tool/software: Linux
Hi TI team,
Is there ljcb_clk(input) AC Specifications for AM5728?
LJCB_CLKP / AG15
LJCB_CLKN / AH15
We are checking the AC Specifications.
Should we follow the Specifications below?
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Will,
The signal that you are measuring is generated in your schematic by the CDCM9102. How is the CDCM9102 output configured? The CDCM9102 supports both LVDS and LVPECL output modes. The datasheet shows that strict HCSL compliance is met with LVPECL which requires a DC path to ground for each outputs. This is because LVPECL is a current-mode driver. LVDS does not require the resistors to ground but the levels may not be HCSL compliant.
Tom
WTMEC_Will,
Section 2.1.3 of the PCIe CEM spec provides the REFCLK AC Specifications. Section 4.3.7 of the PCIe Base spec also provides Refclk AC Specifications including 5GT/s. These are the relevant AC specifications for the LJCB clock input to the PCIe module.
Tom
WTMEC_Will,
A colleague provided a more clear direction for these specs. You should refer to:
Section 2.1.3 of the CEM spec for REFCLK DC and timing requirements
Section 4.3.7 of the Base Spec for REFCLK jitter requirements
Tom
Vijay,
My previous post was sufficient. The tables in the referenced sections are applicable.
Tom
Will,
From the previous post, you show the scope probes attached right at the LJCB inputs (at the termination and after the series capacitors). Is that where this measurement was taken? Was the scope set for DC-coupled measurements?
Tom
Will,
Also, what is the operating mode of the clock driver? The series capacitors are not recommended when the source clock is HCSL compliant.
Tom
Will,
Please provide a scope capture with the probes attached on the other side of the capacitors. Also provide the table of measurements with pass/fail assertions.
Tom
We have not tested the front end of the capacitor, because our test unit will only test the terminal results, the terminal is used to the CPU.
the test capacitor front-end we do not have any meaning, and we are currently CLK gen is configured for the LVDS mode.
The standard is part 2.1.3 of the previous information
Vijay,
The HCSL or LVDS compliance testing can only be done on the driver side of the capacitors. Once the clock signal goes through the capacitors, the DC level is removed. Therefore, to validate the signal matches the compliance table, the measurements must be made on the driver side of the capacitors.
Tom
Vijay,
No, that is not what I said. The data is collected at the wrong point. If you want to validate that the clock signal is complaint to the HCSL standard or the LVDS standard, you will need to collect data on the driver side of the capacitors.
Tom
Vijay,
Why are you asking for an update. I have provided the needed information. Since you are trying to compare against a standard, you must sample the clock on the driver side of the capacitors. This must be done to check compliance.
Tom
Denny,
Responses below:
Q: As AM57xx TRM mentioned "RX is a clock slicer that receives HCSL or LVDS differential clock".
A: This statement does not mean that DC coupling can be used for either HCSL or LVDS. It means that with proper circuitry, both HCSL and LVDS clock sources can be used.
Q: 1. So why the EVM add 0.1uf capacitor here? When adding the capacitor, the DC will be removed, then it can't meet PCIe 2.1.3 spec at AM57xx ljcb_clkp/n pin.
A: As stated in the Data Manual excerpt, the series capacitors are only required if an LVDS clock source is used. This eliminates the DC bias voltage that would violate the single-ended voltage limits on the ljcb pins. If an HCSL-compliant clock is used, it can be DC-coupled to the ljcb pins. However, there is no negative effect to adding DC-blocking caps with an HCSL clock.
A: HCSL compliance or LVDS compliance is not required at the ljcb pins. HCSL compliance or LVDS compliance is required at the clock that is provided for the ljcb pins.
Q: 2. Does the DC(Vcross) is not necessary at AM57XX side?
A: The DC(Vcross) spec is part of the requirements for HCSL compliance per the PCIe spec chapters. This must be met when qualifying the HCSL clock source. If series capacitors are implemented when using an HCSL clock source, the HCSL compliance cannot be verified at the ljcb pins. HCSL compliance must be verified at the input to the series capacitors.
A: The DC(Vcross) spec is not required at the ljcb input pins. The signal at these pins can be balanced at VSS.
Tom
Vijay,
No. The ljcb pins cannot withstand the DC levels on a differential pair that contains an LVDS-compliant signal. The series capacitors are needed to block this DC bias. However, if you want to probe to validate that an LVDS-compliant signal is attached, you must probe on the driver side of these capacitors where the DC bias is still present.
Tom
Vijay,
From re-reading your previous post, I believe you do not fully understand the precise meaning of your words. When you say a signal is compliant to LVDS, then this includes all parts of the spec including AC swing min and max as well as DC bias. That is why I keep saying the pins cannot accept a signal compliant to LVDS. The signals can accept the AC swing levels for LVDS but they cannot accept the DC bias. That is why the series capacitors are required.
Tom
Hi Tom
So ljcp the pin to receive the specification is the following table in addition to Vos all the other norms?