CCS/tms320c6678: processor-sdk CSL bug?

canfoderiskii

Part Number: TMS320C6678
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: PROCESSOR-SDK-C667X

Tool/software: Code Composer Studio

Processor-SDK-c667x 3.2.0.5

1. In the file csl_cptsAux.h, csl_cpts.h, cslr_cpts.h, maybe it is not correct for C6678 to use the V0 version. I think it should be V4.

2. In the file csl_cpsgmii_def.h, the following codes should be added at the end of file right before the last "#endif":

#ifdef __cplusplus

}

#endif

over 8 years ago

0 Cvetolin Shulev-XID over 8 years ago

TI__Guru 65405 points

I've forwarded this to the software experts. Their feedback should be posted here.

BR
Tsvetolin Shulev

0 canfoderiskii over 8 years ago in reply to Cvetolin Shulev-XID

Expert 2255 points

Hi, actually the question I posted is not relative to Linux, I guess.

0 lding over 8 years ago in reply to canfoderiskii

TI__Guru* 95265 points

Hi,

Thanks for finding this out. C6678 should use V4 for CPTS. csl_cpsgmii_def.h should have those code at the end. I open a ticket for this.

Regards, Eric

0 lding over 8 years ago in reply to lding

TI__Guru* 95265 points

Hi,

For the csl_cpsgmii_def.h issue, it will be fixed in Release 3.3, coming out soon.

For the V4 issue, it will be fixed in the next release after 3.3, as this needs more testing and can't catch in 3.3. Please note that the change is pushed to external git
GIT URL: git.ti.com/.../common-csl-ip.git
Commit ID: 14565fc374f10dffae5ab8766dd278b0828244b7
Ref Commit Msg: prsdk-2187: corrected right implementation version for c6678 cpts (note this is commit message one commit before the one put above)

Regards, Eric

Processors

Processors forum

CCS/tms320c6678: processor-sdk CSL bug?