• State
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 98 subscribers
  • Views 188 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

SPRAA01 and SPRAA14

Igor
Intellectual 630 points


Hi,
I test examples from SPRAA14 and SPRAA01 in strict accordance with the documents. Everything works but the window Cycle Total Goal is 100 times greater than in the examples. Is this normal? Or I need something to change somewhere?
Thanks,
Igor
  • 0
    TI__Mastermind 37340 points

    This is not my area of expertise, but one thing that comes to mind is if you are using the same DSP and MHz rating as what is suggested in the App Note.  This could have an impact in the numbers you get.

  • 0 in reply to Juan Gonzales
    Intellectual 630 points
    I used the simulator C6416, as in the document. Although my DM6437 board, I think that in this case it does not matter. The question I asked because I want to understand whether all the settings I have the right and it will not negatively impact on my own work programs. Maybe someone has already faced such a huge difference in the results of the examples and repeat them on your computer? I can understand the difference in 2-3 times but not more then 100 and for simulator.  Here must be a reason...
  • 0 in reply to Igor
    TI__Mastermind 37340 points

    I believe that when using the simulator, it is vey important to set the clock speed correctly to match that of your device (C6416 in this case), otherwise, you could see results such as what you are seeing.   Unfortunately, I am not familiar enough with the process on how to do this under CCS.