This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Linux/TDA2: a15 and c66 optimization which is faster for algorithm

Part Number: TDA2


Tool/software: Linux

The same algorithm was optimized in A15 (NEON multithreading) and C66 (data DMA to L2 and Instruction Optimization) respectively. The result is obviously fast on A15. Is this normal? C66 should be specialized in making algorithms faster.