Dear all,
I found the test U disk, ext3, and 10 times the performance of Fat32 difference, why? Here are my test results
Scene 1.ext3 coexist with the fat32 file system test two (sdb1 is ext3 sdc4 as fat32)
root@/mnt/sdc4# mount
rootfs on / type rootfs
(rw)
/dev/root on / type yaffs2 (rw)
proc on /proc type proc (rw)
sysfs
on /sys type sysfs (rw)
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw)
usbfs on
/proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)
tmpfs on /dev type tmpfs (rw)
devpts on
/dev/pts type devpts (rw)
tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw)
/dev/mtdblock4
on /fonts/truetype type yaffs2 (rw)
/dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
on /mnt/sdb1 type ext3
(rw,data=ordered)
/dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0/part4 on /mnt/sdc4 type
vfat
74484 /mnt/sdb1/firmware
user 0m0.270s
sys 0m13.740s
user 0m0.040s
sys 0m7.970s
Scene 2. A single fat32 file system type test (sdb1 and sdc4 the same as fat32)
rootfs on / type rootfs (rw)
/dev/root on / type yaffs2 (rw)
proc on /proc type proc (rw)
sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw)
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw)
usbfs on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)
tmpfs on /dev type tmpfs (rw)
devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw)
tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw)
/dev/mtdblock4 on /fonts/truetype type yaffs2 (rw)
/dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0/part4 on /mnt/sdc4 type vfat
/dev/scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 on /mnt/sdb1 type vfat
root@/mnt/sdc4# time cp ./update/firmware /mnt/sdb1/
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m4.660s
