• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Subscribers 98 subscribers
  • Views 519 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Original question:

TDA2PXEVM: TI Cascade Radar Development with AWR1243

TDA2: Use-case Development for Cascaded Radar Design

Nishant G
Expert 1600 points

Part Number: TDA2
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: AWR1243

Hello,

I am trying to understand the fundamental differences between different use-case and develop my own use-case for my application. In the use-case "multi_radar_capture_fft_display," you have used 'ISSCapture' algorithm process to collect CSI-2 data from AWR1243 radar sensor. However, in the use-case "cascade_radar_object_detect", you have used "Capture" algorithm process to collect CSI-2 radar data. What is the fundamental difference between these two processes? Is there any advantage of using one over another?

I look forward to your reply. Thank you!

Best Regards,

Nishant

  • 0
    TI__Mastermind 30245 points
    Hi Nishant,

    ISSCapture is using CAL driver to capture the data in the underlying link. "Capture" is using VIP driver to capture the data in the underlying link. The choice is based on how the AWR1243 is connected to the TDA (via CSI/CAL or via VIP (parallel)).

    Thanks and Regards,
    Piyali