This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Lian,
What you describe is exactly the behavior shown in the McASP User's Guide in section 2.4.2.1 in Figure 23 on page 38. This is not a problem, but rather this is the solution to the problem of getting full bandwidth from the McASP data line(s) with any of the delay values.
The AFSX is not a data enable signal but instead it is a data start signal. Some receivers do not require a delay and some do require a delay. In the case of XDATDLY=2, the receiver will start capturing data 2 cycles after the AFSX is received and will continue capturing data for a total of 32 bit clocks, for a 32-bit data word. The receiver must then be capable of noting the next AFSX signal while still capturing the previous slot of data, and then continuing capture of a new 32-bit word 2 cycles later.
If it is easier to use XDATDLY=0 or 1, then those options are also available.
If this does not resolve your question, please provide additional information about why this is a problem in your case.
Regards,
RandyP
If this answers your question, please click the Verify Answer button below. If not, please reply back with more information.
Thanks for your reply! Your post said that the phenomenon that I described is is just what should be. Because I use DSP to connect with FPGA through MCASP. After the FPGA receives the 32bits, I hope there will be 2 clock cycle for FPGA to handle the data. so is there a method to make that there is 34 numbers of CLOCK between 2 FSX.
Thanks a lot!
Lian said:is there a method to make that there is 34 numbers of CLOCK between 2 FSX.
There is nothing that I know of. You may wish to carefully review the McASP User's Guide for the various modes of operation to see if there is any method you could adapt, but I cannot think of it.
Regards,
RandyP