This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

C6474 SYS Clock vs FSYNC Clock

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMS320C6474

I have a customer asking the following questions:

I have another question and it’s in regard to the relationship between SYSCLK and FSYNC CLK on the C6474.  In the TMS320C6474 Hardware Design Guide, SPRAAW7B, sheet 31 it states that:

 

For proper operation of the AIF, the SYSCLKP/N (which is the antenna interface SERDES reference

clock) and the frame sync clock (either FSYNCCLKP/N or ALTFSYNCCLK) must be generated from the

same clock source and must be assured not to drift relative to each other.

 

Since there is not a quantitative number given I am not sure if I implemented this correctly.  Referring to the attached pdf I initally used a 61.44MHz oscillator and divided it down to get 30.72MHz and buffered it to maintain the 61.44MHz.  I used a SY8973L which is low skew and low jitter.  I distributed these clocks to my 6 DSPs using LVDS108 repeaters.

 

It was suggested in my design review by another engineer that I should consider the alternative of placing the SY89873L near the DSP and using the LVDS108 to distribute the 61.44MHz clock.

 

Is there an advantage/disadvantage to either method?

Does SYSCLK and FSYNCCK have to be matched in length?

 

 2018.sysclk_vs_fsync.PDF