• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 5 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 30 subscribers
  • Views 418 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Original question:

DRV5053 sensitivity distribution

DRV5053: Sensitivity Distribution of EA version

user5092084
Prodigy 30 points
Part Number: DRV5053

I am using EA version. What is the standard deviation of sensitivity of this version?

  • 0
    TI__Mastermind 26205 points
    Hello,

    Thank you for using the TI forum. I am looking into this question to see if I can find any more specific information to share with you besides what is already in the datasheet. I will update you tomorrow on my progress.
  • 0 in reply to Mitch M
    TI__Mastermind 26205 points
    Hello,

    I do not have access to any specific distribution data, but the specification in the datasheet does follow a Gaussian distribution with a mean of 45 and tails that extend to the min/max (20,70). The min/max limits are guaranteed by final test, so no device should show behavior outside of that range.
  • 0 in reply to Mitch M
    Prodigy 30 points

    Thanks for your prompt reply.

    I've seen similar questions in this forum. (I thought I had posted this question as a related question.)

    Its thread title is "DRV5053 sensitivity distribution" and was posted on Mar 22, 2016.

    In this thread, the sensitivity distribution of different versions were answered but EA version was not answered.

    I'd like to know rough value if you know.

  • 0 in reply to user5092084
    TI__Mastermind 26205 points
    Hello,

    Yes, you did post this as a related question. Sorry I did not see that before. According to that observation, the typical sigma for the EA version would be ≈2mV/mT. Please keep in mind that this value derived from RE's observed data, and as he stated, "I can't make any guarantee about the distribution of units you receive though, of course."
  • 0 in reply to Mitch M
    Prodigy 30 points

    Thank you so much!