This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

IWR6843: What's wrong with profileCfg of IWR6843's cfg?

Part Number: IWR6843


Dear TechnicalSupport

I use IWR6843 ISK(ES2.0) following FW was burned.

C:\ti\mmwave_industrial_toolbox_4_2_1\labs\people_counting\68xx_3D_people_counting\prebuilt_binaries\3D_people_count_68xx_demo.bin

And, I can work IWR6843 using following cfg.

C:\ti\mmwave_industrial_toolbox_4_2_1\labs\people_counting\68xx_3D_people_counting\chirp_configs\ISK_6m_default.cfg

But, I changed "profileCfg", IWR6843 is not able to work.

What's wrong with profileCfg?

====================================

sensorStop
flushCfg
dfeDataOutputMode 1
channelCfg 15 7 0
adcCfg 2 1
adcbufCfg -1 0 1 1 1
lowPower 0 0
%profileCfg 0 60.75 7 7 41.10 1184274 0 54.7125 1   96 2950.00 0 0 36    orginal
profileCfg 0 60 7 7 28 0 0 60 1 256 12500 0 0 48
chirpCfg 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
chirpCfg 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
chirpCfg 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 4
frameCfg 0 2  96  0 50 1 0
dynamicRACfarCfg -1 4 4 2 4 8 16 4 4 4.00 4.50 0.50 1 1
staticRACfarCfg -1 4 4 2 4 8 16 4 6 8.00 13.00 0.30 0 0
dynamicRangeAngleCfg -1 0.75 0.0010 1 0
dynamic2DAngleCfg -1 3 0.0300 1 0 1 0.50 0.85 8.00
staticRangeAngleCfg -1 1 8 2
antGeometry0 0 -1 -2 -3 -2 -3 -4 -5 -4 -5 -6 -7
antGeometry1 -1 -1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 -1 -1 -1 -1
antPhaseRot 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
fovCfg -1 70.0 20.0
compRangeBiasAndRxChanPhase 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
staticBoundaryBox -2 2 2 8.5 -2 2
boundaryBox -2.5 2.5 0.5 6 -2.5 2.5
sensorPosition 2 0 10
gatingParam 3 1.5 1.5 2 0
stateParam 3 3 10 40 5 600
allocationParam 200 800 0.1 15 0.5 20
trackingCfg 1 2 1000 20 67 105 50
sensorStart

====================================

Best Regrads

  • Hi User,

    Can you elaborate on why you have changed the profileCfg this way?

    We'll need a few days for a response.

    Regards,

    AG

  • Former Member
    0 Former Member

    The cfg you have created is invalid because it exceeds the radar cube size limitation. In your cfg the radar cube size would 1152 kB when the limit is 768.

    Please see this thread on how you can perform these calculations yourself: https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors/f/1023/t/895114

    Amanda

  • Dear Amanda

    Thank you for your reply.

    The calculate method of "radar cube size" is below, isn't it?

    {radar cube size} = {float:4Byte} × {Tx Antenna:4} × {Tx Antenna:4} × numAdcSamples × numberOfLoops

    But even if I reduce numberOfLoops to reduce radar cube size, it doesn't work.

    The radar cube size of below cfg is 197kB and smaller than 768kB.

    ====================================

    sensorStop
    flushCfg
    dfeDataOutputMode 1
    channelCfg 15 7 0
    adcCfg 2 1
    adcbufCfg -1 0 1 1 1
    lowPower 0 0
    %profileCfg 0 60.75 7 7 41.10 1184274 0 54.7125 1   96 2950.00 0 0 36    orginal
    profileCfg 0 60 7 7 28 0 0 60 1 256 12500 0 0 48
    chirpCfg 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
    chirpCfg 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
    chirpCfg 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 4
    %frameCfg 0 2  96  0 50 1 0
    frameCfg 0 2  16  0 50 1 0
    dynamicRACfarCfg -1 4 4 2 4 8 16 4 4 4.00 4.50 0.50 1 1
    staticRACfarCfg -1 4 4 2 4 8 16 4 6 8.00 13.00 0.30 0 0
    dynamicRangeAngleCfg -1 0.75 0.0010 1 0
    dynamic2DAngleCfg -1 3 0.0300 1 0 1 0.50 0.85 8.00
    staticRangeAngleCfg -1 1 8 2
    antGeometry0 0 -1 -2 -3 -2 -3 -4 -5 -4 -5 -6 -7
    antGeometry1 -1 -1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 -1 -1 -1 -1
    antPhaseRot 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    fovCfg -1 70.0 20.0
    compRangeBiasAndRxChanPhase 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
    staticBoundaryBox -2 2 2 8.5 -2 2
    boundaryBox -2.5 2.5 0.5 6 -2.5 2.5
    sensorPosition 2 0 10
    gatingParam 3 1.5 1.5 2 0
    stateParam 3 3 10 40 5 600
    allocationParam 200 800 0.1 15 0.5 20
    trackingCfg 1 2 1000 20 67 105 50
    sensorStart

    ====================================

    Bes Regards.

  • Former Member
    0 Former Member in reply to user6005362

    Hello,

    This issue is continues on this thread: https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors/f/1023/t/897426

    I'll close this one.

    Thanks,

    Amanda