Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TINA-TI
Tool/software:
Hi,
We are using the mentioned part as a gain switch, however its performance is much worse in simulation that in reality. Could there be a bug in the off resistance model? The problem is reproducible in LTspice using both the PSPICE and the TINA-TI models.
At 100 Hz in the AC analysis the off resistance is approximately 1/3 MΩ. Corresponding to 1 MΩ Roff between COM and each of the NO0, NO1, and NO2. Based on the off state leak current and bandwidth specs I would expect Roff to be at least two orders of magnitude higher.
Could you please check the models?
TIA
/Asger
Netlist:
* gain-switch.asc V1 VCC 0 3.3 V3 in 0 1.65 AC 1 XU3 gain_a gain_b in VCC N001 N002 N003 0 TS5A3359 V4 gain_a 0 {gain_aa} V5 gain_b 0 {gain_bb} R1 out N001 500k R3 out N003 5k R2 N002 out 50k R5 0 out 50 .step param n 1 4 1 .param gain_aa table(n, 1, 0, 2, 3.3, 3, 0, 4, 3.3) .param gain_bb table(n, 1, 0, 2, 0, 3, 3.3, 4, 3.3) ; calculate resistance at 100 Hz, display result in (mag, phase) .option meascplxfmt=polar .meas AC res FIND V(out,in)/I(R5) AT 100 .ac dec 10 20 100k .lib TS5A3359.lib .backanno .end
From the .log file Measurement: res step v(out,in)/i(r5) at 1 (377349,-8.13902°) 100 2 (252343,-4.43533°) 100 3 (46147.8,-0.604821°) 100 4 (4960.34,-0.0610923°) 100