Because of the holidays, TI E2E™ design support forum responses will be delayed from Dec. 25 through Jan. 2. Thank you for your patience.

  • State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 53 subscribers
  • Views 363 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Similar topics

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

CCS11 Compiler cg430.exe application crash

Alexey Izmaylov
Prodigy 10 points

Good day for all. Recently I updated CCS from 8 to 11 version. During my project building there was a windows error occured:

Signature of the problem:

Name of the event of the problem: APPCRASH

Application name: cg430.exe

Applicatin version: 21.6.0.0

Application timestamp: 60b0659c

Module name of the problem: ntdll.dll

Module version of the problem: 6.1.7601.23714

Timestamp of the problem module: 58bf89e8

Exception code: c00000fd

Exception offset: 000000000004f42f

OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.1

Language code: 1049

Extra info 1: edaf

Extra info 2: edaf31470ab0549e8bae3de7f29bf714

Extra info 3: 821f

Extra info 4: 821f6a067ef88b0b2493011ba4b74761

According to "How to Submit a Compiler Test Case" I uploaded the case:

flow.zip

  • 0
    TI__Guru**** 241495 points

    Thank you for notifying us of this problem, and submitting a detailed test case.  I cannot reproduce the exact same result, but I do see an unexpected error.  I filed the entry EXT_EP-10733 to have this investigated.  You are welcome to follow it with that link.

    Thanks and regards,

    -George

  • 0 in reply to George Mock
    TI__Guru**** 241495 points

    To understand why I marked this thread resolved, please see the first FAQ in the CCS Forum Usage Guidelines.

    Thanks and regards,

    -George

  • +1 in reply to George Mock
    TI__Guru**** 241495 points

    A workaround just got added to EXT_EP-10733.

    To apply the workaround in your specific case, change the function ussHandle as follows ...

    void ussHandle(DWORD*regAddr){

  volatile DWORD usd_begin = (DWORD) usdLeaBunker;
  volatile DWORD usd_end   = (DWORD) usdLeaBunker+2*372;
  volatile DWORD gus_begin = (DWORD) gUSSLEATempMemBlock;
  volatile DWORD gus_end   = (DWORD) gUSSLEATempMemBlock+2*372;

  if((*regAddr >= (gus_begin + 0x50) && (*regAddr < gus_end - 0x50))){
    if(ussActive != 0)
      *regAddr = *regAddr - gus_begin - 0x50 + usd_begin;
  }else if((*regAddr >= usd_begin) && (*regAddr < usd_end)){
    if(ussActive == 0)
      *regAddr = *regAddr - usd_begin + gus_begin + 0x50;
  }
}

    I realize that, in your source code, this function probably uses a lot of #define macros.  So, the actual code changes will be different.  Still, I hope these suggested changes are helpful.

    Thanks and regards,

    -George

  • 0 in reply to George Mock
    Prodigy 10 points

    I hope this issue will be taken into account in future versions of the compiler.