• State TI Thinks Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 52 subscribers
  • Views 766 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Similar topics

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Compiler/TMS320F28335: LOAD placement ignored for "xxxx": object is uninitialized

Leong
Expert 1070 points
Part Number: TMS320F28335

Tool/software: TI C/C++ Compiler

Hi, 

I have a custom cmd file which defines the load and run locations for some parameters that i would like to calibrate. the behavior and setup is very similar to the other thread, which is locked for now

CLA Warning - C2000 microcontrollers forum - C2000™︎ microcontrollers - TI E2E support forums

e2e.ti.com
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CONTROLSUITE Hi, I got a warning when i build my project. " LOAD placement ignored for "Cla1Data": object is uninitialized"

the only difference is that i'm on a 28335 and I'm not using CLA.

after a few trys, i found that statements like

#pragma DATA_SECTION(aDataName, "aDataSec")

int aDataName = 1234;

in a custom declared data_section would NOT be considered 'initialized data' thus the warning and wrong behavior. 

i was able to get around by adding a const keyword:

#pragma DATA_SECTION(aDataName, "aDataSec")

const int aDataName = 1234;

then the warning goes away, the data is put in the right flash location.

but this aDataName var isn't really a constant. i'm tuning it in the RUN location, which is ram. I don't change it in the code but with memory write directly so i would rather not to declare it const.

Can anyone from the compiler team to look into this issue? why a standard C statement with initial value declaration is not honored by the compiler? is this a bug in the compiler? any reference document? 

I see a few similar posts in the forum but i don't think any one of them got a straight answer out yet.

thanks.

regards

gzhang

  • 0
    TI__Guru**** 244710 points

    The following discussion pertains to static or global variables, and not variables that are local to a function.

    When you write something like ...

    int normal_var = 10;

    The compiler makes entries in two different sections.  It creates space in a read-write section (normally .ebss) for the variable normal_var.  And it arranges a record in the .cinit section that, when processed at boot time, copies the value 10 to normal_var.

    Contrast that with ...

    const int const_var = 20;

    In this case, the compiler only makes one entry in a read-only section (normally .econst).  The entry both creates and initializes the variable.

    I find this part confusing ...

    Leong said:
    but this aDataName var isn't really a constant. i'm tuning it in the RUN location, which is ram. I don't change it in the code but with memory write directly so i would rather not to declare it const.

    ... so I'm not sure what you should do.  But I am confident you can work that out by using this explanation on the difference between a non-const initialized variable and a const initialized variable.

    Thanks and regards,

    -George