• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 54 subscribers
  • Views 494 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Original question:

CCS: CC1352R: simple link Error Code 3800 implies parameter error. Any way of finding what parameter was incorrect?

CCS: CC1352R: OAD in a simple link application

Mikael Rinne
Prodigy 160 points
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SYSCONFIG

Tool/software: Code Composer Studio

Hello,

I'd like to make a OAD over sub-1GHz and found a easylink example. We use simplelink in our application.    

I get the build error indicating not finding ti_easylink_oad_config.h. This happens after pulling in folders oad and common from rfWsnNodeExtFlashOadClient_CC1352R1_LAUNCHXL_tirtos_ccs to 

the test example "rfWakeOnRadioTx_CC1352R1_LAUNCHXL_tirtos_ccs".

ti_easylink_oad_config.h is part of syscfg. When attempting to set "Easy Link" in addition to "Custom", the msg in the syscfg wizard is "SysConfig Does Not Currently Support Multiple Stack Configuration".

I do this under the expandable "RF STACKS"

So how do you suggest me to go forward in order to have a OAD over sub-1GHz.


Cheers

Mikael

  • 0
    TI__Guru 58425 points

    Hi Mikael,

    There is a few options here. You could either go with running on Easylink instead of proprietary and re-use their OAD implementation, or you could simply derive your own based on theirs. 

    No matter the stack, you could choose to re-use the same bootloader (project called BIM found under no-rtos) and then simply make a OAD solution that complies with this:

    * An application which is linked and built to be compatible with the bootloader.

    * Use the image header (possibly borrow the same tools they use to prepare the image for OAD)

    * Create your own logic for moving data from A -> B, verify and re-flash.

  • 0 in reply to IUsedToBeARealPerson (M-W)
    Prodigy 160 points

    Ok M-W,

    Good to know there is nothing like this prepared. I'll check if remaking it is the path the project wants to go.

    Thank you!

    Mikael