This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

does opa694 spice code work right?

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA694, TINA-TI

Hi, I am working on a non-inverting operational amplifier circuit simulation with LTspice. I am using spice code of opa694 as op-amp but there is something wrong because It gives me approximately 12V as output signal which is too high than expected. When I draw the circuit with voltage dependent voltage source instead of opa694 I took the output voltage as microvolt level which is expected. Might be any problem with this opamp code or something else? I am adding LTspice netlist below. If you please help me, It will be very useful.

* opa694 .asc
V1 0 N001 PWL(0 0 10n 2u 20n 0 30n 0)
D9 N001 0 D
D10 0 N001 D
R30 0 N001 200
R31 N003 N004 3.6K
R32 0 N003 470
R35 N004 0 100
XIC1 N001 N004 N005 N002 N003 opa694
CD1 N005 0 22nF
CD2 0 N002 22nF
Vee2 0 N002 {V}
Vcc5 N005 0 {V}
.model D D
.lib C:\Program Files (x86)\LTC\LTspiceIV\lib\cmp\standard.dio
.PARAM V=5
.tran 0 300n 0
*.subckt D 1 2

*******************************************

*

*PMLL4448

*

*NXP Semiconductors

*

*High-speed diodes

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*VRRM = 100V

*IFRM = 450 mA

*trr  = 4ns

*

*

*Package pinning does not match Spice model pinning.

*Package: SOD80C

*

*Package Pin 1 : Cathode

*Package Pin 2 : Anode

*

*

*

*

*Simulator: PSPICE

*

*******************************************

*#

.SUBCKT PMLL4448 1 2

*

* The resistor R1 does not reflect

* a physical device. Instead it

* improves modeling in the reverse

* mode of operation.

*

R1 1 2 5.827E+9

D1 1 2 PMLL4448

*

.MODEL PMLL4448 D

+ IS = 4.352E-9

+ N = 1.906

+ BV = 110

+ IBV = 0.0001

+ RS = 0.6458

+ CJO = 7.048E-13

+ VJ = 0.869

+ M = 0.03

+ FC = 0.5

+ TT = 3.48E-9

.ENDS

*
.PARAM E=1000000
.lib opa694.lib
* 3
* 2
.backanno
.end


]