This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Part Number: SN6501
I'm currently having a issue with a circuit in which a SN6501 is used. It looks like that surge impulses on the AC-line can pass through the AC-filter, ACDC-converter, +5 V linear regulator and the SN6501 connected to this. At the moment of the surge, a extremely short voltage peak (maximum 1 us) of ~ 6 V can be seen on the 5 V rail. This is also the absolut maximum voltage rating of the SN6501. After this peak, it somehow increases its current consumption to ~ 400 mA and will fail, propably because of overheating.
As we are still looking for the root cause, I'm thinking about the internal components of the SN6501. Are there any clamping diodes that will get conductive in case of supply voltages above 5 V? Or could this device be affected by a latch-up effect due to this spike?
Thanks in advance,Christian
Hi Christian,Thank you for posting to E2E! A Zener diode with 5.5V or 6V Zener voltage like 1SMB5919BT3G or 1SMB5920BT3G can be used to protect the SN6501 from voltages above the 5V rail.To fully analyze the device's behavior, can you share oscilloscope images of the waveform? As well as oscilloscope waveforms of the D1/D2 pins during this surge impulse?Respectfully,Manuel Chavez
We are glad that we were able to resolve this issue, and will now proceed to close this thread.
If you have further questions related to this thread, you may click "Ask a related question" below. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
In reply to Manuel Chavez:
I already tried to use a 5 V TVS diode to clamp the voltage, unfortunatelly with no effect. I can provide scope images, but until now I did not measure the D1/D2 pins.
I'm currently thinking, that this might happen due to a ground shift and latch-up of the internal FETs in the SN6501. Could you therefore please provide information about the internals like if this is even possible on this device and whether or not there is a clamping diode or similar inside the device?
In reply to Christian Waechter:
Hi Christian,Can you please share a part number of the TVS diode used? Additionally, details of the time it takes the SN6501 to recover from this condition (or if a power cycle is required) will be helpful along with the transformer's part number.Please allow me 1 - 2 days to confirm the device internals with you. In the meantime, a quick experiment to isolate the root cause is to disconnect D1 and D2 from the transformer and to 50Ω pull-up resistors as shown below:Thank you,Manuel Chavez
I used a PPSLC 05 C-LF-T7, not the best part for this, but the only I had right here for testing. The transformer is a Würth 750313734
There are two possible things that happen, when the SN6501 is in this condition.
1) If you recognize the SN6501 fault state and disconnect the power supply within ~ 1 second, the SN6501 works fine after this power cycle2) If you do not recognize the SN6501 fault state, the SN6501 will break and kill it's supply circuit as well. In this fault condition the SN6501 drains ~400 mA for ~2 ms and after that 200 mA more or less continuous, even after a power cycle. If you keep it running for ~2 s it's supply circuit breaks as well as this is only designed for ~20 mA
I can provide you two scope images. First is a overview of the behaviour at a surge impulse at t = 0 and after that a detail. Notice the drop of the 5 V voltage in cyan on the detail image right after the surge impuls
Blue = Voltage L to PERed = Voltage N to PEGreen = Current of the circuit which is only a MIC5235 that provides 5 V to the SN6501Magenta = Input Voltage of MIC5235Cyan = Output Voltage of MIC5235 = Input voltage of SN6501
Hi Christian,Thank you for including these waveforms. It appears the input voltage the SN6501 rises to >10V. There is no clamping mechanism in the device, and normally a latch condition is not expected. It's possible however that this overvoltage affects an internal ESD cell by exceeding the reverse bias rating at its peak (>6V is the absolute maximum rating for Vcc), creating a short circuit path internally that lasts even after the overvoltage. If the ESD cell conducts too much current for too long, like 200mA for 2 seconds, it would eventually be destroyed.Can you please check impedance between Vcc and GND pins? Can you also provide a copy of the Zener diode datasheet? I apologize but could not find it online...Thank you, and have a great weekend!Best,Manuel Chavez
Hi Christian,Hopefully all is well. Given the length of this transient, it is possible our SN6505 device will withstand the overvoltage and its internal current protection will protect the part. Please do let me know the information requested above and if it is possible to replace the SN6501 with the SN6505B in this system.Thank you for your time,Manuel Chavez
Manuel ChavezCan you please check impedance between Vcc and GND pins?
Manuel ChavezCan you also provide a copy of the Zener diode datasheet?
Please see the attached file. As I said, this is not the perfect diode but the only I had right here for testing with this voltage.
Manuel ChavezPlease do let me know the information requested above and if it is possible to replace the SN6501 with the SN6505B in this system.
What is the difference between the SN6501 and SN6505B in case of overvoltage protection? Both have the same absolute maximum ratings and I do not need 1 A, that the SN6505B can deliver.
Hi Christian,Thank you for the TVS diode datasheet. The diode's minimum breakdown voltage of 6V means there is a high probability that it is not protecting the SN6501. Swapping out this device can protect the system from this 10V transient.
Christian WaechterThis is always different on the broken devices. Sometimes it's a short circuit, sometimes it's at around 3 kOhm
Christian WaechterWhat is the difference between the SN6501 and SN6505B in case of overvoltage protection? Both have the same absolute maximum ratings and I do not need 1 A, that the SN6505B can deliver.
Hi Christian,Please let me know how you would like to correct the transient issue affecting the SN6501. It may still be worthwhile to check this scenario with the SN6505B in place of the SN6501 since it is a newer part and more robust in general.I will await your response.Thank you,Manuel Chavez
Hi Christian,Have you been able to further test against this voltage transient? Please follow up with results soon to prevent the thread from being closed due to inactivity. Thank you for your time,Manuel Chavez
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.