This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LM5060-Q1: the Variation Data

Part Number: LM5060-Q1
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM5069, LM5060

Hi,

We got a question from the customer about LM5060-Q1.
Could you help us?

[Question]
How much is the variation of below characteristics at over operating temperature range? They don't need guarantee. They will use it as reference.

 1kohm *please refer to below figure
 500ohm *please refer to below figure
 Vtmrh
 Vtmrl
 tfault

Best Regards,
tateo

  • Tateo,

    These are not characterized wrt absolute values. The key is that they will be fairly well matched in ratio and over temp, which is more important. Keep in mind the current sources ranges (both 8uA on OUT and 16uA on SENSE) are more important. These will also track one another to keep the Vds comparator input consistent. The 16uA on SENSE affects the actual trip point so matched or not, its variance is the most important item to take into account. Its range in the EC table is 13.6uA to 18uA over temp.

    I don't know why the timer threshold ranges are not shown in the DS. Typical upper and lower ranges are there as you note. Similar devices are < +/- 5% and likely the same here. For overall tolernace, safely said +/- 10% would be recommended to use.

    The t-fault time is 5us typical (note no capacitive load so this is primarily the de-glitch delay intentionaly put on this device to prevent nuisance trips). The temp tolernace isn't shown. I would recommend +/- 25% for any tolernace use.

    Keep in mind the LM5060 is a very simple device, not intended for precision current trip points. It fully relies on system Z to limit current as it is only a circuit breaker timeout and will not provide current or FET SOA protection. In many cases, and output short will result in a failed FET. If full fault protection is required, consider the LM5069.

    Brian
  • Hi, Sorry for delayed reply. Thank you for your support. They would like to make sure about Voffset. They are thinking the variation of internal resistor 1k and 500 influences Voffset. So they want to know the variation of it. If Voffset which specified in datasheet include the variation of internal resistor, they don't need it. Should they consider the variation of internal resistor for consideration of Voffset?

    Best Regards,
    tateo

  • Hi, Is there any update for that? I would appreciate it if you give us your feedback.

    Best Regards,
    tateo