Part Number: DS92LV18 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DS92LV16 , , CDCS503 Hi team,
I have a question using DS92LV18 (or DS92LV16),
In the case EMI issue observed at the frequency of TCLK (or x20 of TCLK),
What kind of EMI solution we can consider…
Part Number: AWR1843 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CDCS503
Currently have AWR1843 radar front-end and transfer data to FPGA with LVDS. Does AWR1843 LVDS interface support SSC(spread spectrum clocking)?
Alternatively, If it does not, would CDCS503…
Part Number: CDCS502 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CDCS503 Hi Sirs, Does CDCS502 support single pin input clock oscillator? Can we leave XOUT pin open when using an oscillator? If no, should we use CDCS503 instead? CDCS502 CDCS503 Thank you and Best…
Part Number: CDCS504-Q1 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CDCS503 , CDCS503-Q1 Hi Team,
Does TI have any specs on reference leakage and phase noise performance on CDCS504-Q1?
Thank you in advance.
Regards Maynard
Aaron
Thanks, and the device number is CDCE913, currently customer just want use 1ch, with same input and output frequency, with the selectable SSC function, and do not need the I2C control, so want to know if we have some guide or reference schematic…
Hello Teun! The TAS64xx devices do require a MCLK from the processor or you can use a PLL (e.g. CDCS503) which can create a MCLK from the SCLK. Also, please note that while the M/SCLK pins can be connected that the TAS64xx's do not support MCLK = 64Fs…
