Search tips
Showing 18 results View by: Thread Post Sort by

  • ISO7221A-Q1: Background or Revising the datasheet

    • Resolved
    Part Number: ISO7221A -Q1 Hi, The datasheet was revised on the other day and some spec were degraded

  • ISO7221A-Q1: VISO

    • Resolved
    Part Number: ISO7221A -Q1 Hi, Could you tell me why VISO is added by revising the datasheet

  • ISO7221A-Q1: tsk(o)

    • Resolved
    Part Number: ISO7221A -Q1 Hi, "ISO722xC" was eliminated from tsk(o) by revising the datasheet

  • ISO7221A: UL certificate

    • Resolved
    Part Number: ISO7221A Hi Do you have the UL certificate number of ISO7221A and ask if this IC can

  • ISO7721-Q1: ISO7721-Q1 and ISO7221A-Q1 EMC

    TI Thinks Resolved
    Part Number: ISO7721-Q1 Hi team, Good day. Our customer would like to switch from ISO7221A-Q1 to ISO7721-Q1 since it offers a 100Mbps data rate compared to 1Mbps of ISO7221A-Q1. Since both devices have the same pin-out, is there any impact for automotive...

  • ISO7221A: Low Level in Powered Down mode

    • Resolved
    Part Number: ISO7221A Hello, i am looking for a digital isolator like the ISO7221A , but with a low

  • ISO7221A: 500kbps CAN isolation

    TI Thinks Resolved
    Part Number: ISO7221A Can ISO7221A use for 500kbps CAN interface? I think that ISO7221A can't use this interface because ISO7221 can't keep up with CAN loopback. (require 1Mbps + margin for propagation delay) And propagation delay: 280ns_min...

  • ISO7221C: ISO7221A vs ISO7721D

    TI Thinks Resolved
    Part Number: ISO7221C Good morning, everyone. In my application I have to isolate a canbus line that works at 500kbps. Which of the two isolators do you think is the most suitable? Comparing the two isolators from the DATASHEET I see that the ISO7721...

  • ISO7221A-Q1: 1Mbps signaling rate needed for CAN.

    • Resolved
    Part Number: ISO7221A -Q1 Hi Champs, Its Signaling rate is 1Mbps max. A customer would like to use

  • RE: Digital isolator with fail-safe condition when VCC(Output) is powered down

    So I should be able to use ISO7221A in this way, one side powered off, without having to worry about getting a high signal on the output at that (powered off) side?

Didn't find what you are looking for? Post a new question.


All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.

Content on this site may contain or be subject to specific guidelines or limitations on use. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the Terms of use of the site; third parties using this content agree to abide by any limitations or guidelines and to comply with the Terms of use of this site. TI, its suppliers and providers of content reserve the right to make corrections, deletions, modifications, enhancements, improvements and other changes to the content and materials, its products, programs and services at any time or to move or discontinue any content, products, programs, or services without notice.

TI worldwide | Contact us | myTI login | Corporate citizenship

TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs and
embedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.

© Copyright 1995-2020 Texas Instruments Incorporated. All rights reserved.
Trademarks | Privacy policy | Terms of use