Part Number: CODECOMPOSER Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SYSCONFIG Issue is that linker from
ccs2100/ccs/tools/compiler/ti-cgt-armllvm_5.1.1.LTS
Fails linking our application with sysconfig shiped with simplelink_cc13xx_cc26xx_sdk_8_32_00_07…
Part Number: TI-CGT Tool/software: Hi TI experts,
I have observed some strange behaviour running some bare metal test code on MCU cores on our Jacinto high (J784S4), and I have come to the conclusion it is the compiler generating invalid assembly from…
Part Number: C2000WARE-MOTORCONTROL-SDK Other Parts Discussed in Thread: C2000WARE Using CCS 20.5.0.28, C2000Ware_MotorControl_SDK_6_00_00_00 and compiling with ti-cgt-c2000_25.11.0.LTS I am getting the following warnings in the driverlib headers (can…
Part Number: C7000-CGT
Tool/software:
ti-cgt-c7000_4.1.0.LTS in sdk 10 Getting following error while building ERROR: /ti/ti-cgt-c7000_4.1.0.LTS not found !!!
Part Number: TI-CGT Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TDA4VH Tool/software: Hi TI Experts,
Based on the last discussion in the below thread, customer successfully implemented both TI ARM CGT & TI ARM Clang on two different safety channels in TDA4VH.…
Part Number: TMS320F28P550SG Tool/software: Hi Champ,
I am asking for my customer.
The are using ti-cgt-c2000_22.6.1A23259 as the compiler.
Is the compiler coming from clang compiler ? What's the difference from existing TMS320C28x Compiler v22…
Part Number: ARM-CGT-CLANG Customer is porting self-developed OS from GCC to TI-Clang.
Compiler version: ti-cgt-armllvm_4.0.4.LTS
When compiling their project, they found some warning:
warning #10278-D: LOAD placement specified for section
…
Part Number: C7000-CGT Tool/software: Hi TI support team, I'm trying the compile - https://github.com/kmackay/micro-ecc/tree/master with `ti-cgt-c7000_4.1.0.LTS` as below: ` C:\ti\ti-cgt-c7000_4.1.0.LTS\bin\cl7x.exe --compile_only --c_file=.\micro-ecc…
Part Number: CODECOMPOSER Tool/software: Hello,
I wanted to switch toolchain version from ti-cgt-armllvm_3.2.2.LTS to ti-cgt-armllvm_4.0.3.LTS but fails to compile the same code which was working with 3.2.2. In the 4.0.x compilation fails with following…