Answered

• TPS53659: Is SN1701022 and TPS53659 compatible.

  

  RAJ KUMAR

  Resolved

  Part Number: TPS53659 Hello, I am working on a project where INTEL XEON D-1746 (Idaville, Icelake) Processor is used. I have the power solution from TI for this processor series where the VR13 regulator "SN1701022" is used to generate all the…

  • Resolved

  • 3 months ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

• TPS53659: TPS53659

  

  Lina Sera VARGHESE

  Part Number: TPS53659 Hi, While programming TPS53659RSBR using a customer data file, there is a checksum mismatch after issuing the MFR_SERIAL command (the last command in the customer data file). The expected checksum is 0x412DEB8CF, but the checksum…

  • 4 months ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

• TPS53659: TPS53659

  

  Subrahmanyam V

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: TPS53659 Hello, I couldn't find the accompanying "Technical Reference Manual" for knowing more on the MFR_SPECIFIC_13 register Can you please let me know the download link for the document? Warm regards, Siri

  • 5 months ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

• TPS53659: IBIS model

  

  Kelly Bai

  Part Number: TPS53659 hi team. do we have IBIS model for TPS53659? so that we can do SI simulation. thanks.

  • 4 months ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

• TPS53659: I2C issue

  

  Hailiang Zhang

  Part Number: TPS53659 Hi Team， My customer is evaluating TPS53659 as the second socket for SN1701022. They found that the device can not be found in the I2C bus on board, when it is changed back to the original SN1701022, that works. So is there any difference…

  • 5 months ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

• TPS53659: Output OVP failure

  

  Gopalakrishnan KV

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: TPS53659 This design for CPU core1V8. It use 3 phase design and phase shedding option enabled. It is noticed that at initial stage 2 phases are on and at some point, switching frequency start increasing. It is designed for 800Khz but when…

  • 5 months ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

• TPS53659: Significance of Transient parameter selection

  

  Gopalakrishnan KV

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: TPS53659 Is there any document that explain the significance of parameters that we set in project file, especially on parameters given under transient tab in Fusion Design GUI? How we select the optimum value for non linear control parameters…

  • 6 months ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

• TPS53659: Required VID Format conversion.

  

  Bhargava Vudathu

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: TPS53659 I'm setting the VOUT_Max value in TPS53659 using Fusion Digital Power Designer. I have setted 2.5V as VOUT_Max value in 0x24h . And while read back that register, I'm getting 0xC900 How to convert that hex value to deciaml…

  • 6 months ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

• TPS53659: Iout reporting error

  

  Ben Kuo

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: TPS53659 Dear team, We use TPS53659 and read back per phase Iout and total Iout. And found current cannot align between this two value. We design TPS53659 as 3 phase application, and when we summarize per phase current(24.09+23.06+24.78…

  • 11 months ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

• TPS53659: the PWM state during power off sequence

  

  Fanbin Meng

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: TPS53659 Hi Team, when we follow the power down seqence , what is the PWM state when the VR_EN is removed but the 3.3V is still there? and what is the PWM state during the 3.3 power off?

  • over 1 year ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

Didn't find what you are looking for? Post a new question.