Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS61071 Hi
Let me ask about the production situation of the TPS61071 IC, present the price is increasing and the limited quantity? I am using this component for long term project and mass production. The price increase…
Part Number: TPS61071 HI Team,
My customer now use TPS61071 so as to convert 4V to 5V.
Customer now haven't added load. And found that the output and FB is very strange.
The Vin and Enable are ok.
Customer have made several board, and each board have…
Part Number: TPS61071 Hi Team,
My customer now use TPS61071 to boost 4V to 5V.
Now they haven't added load in their circuit. The measurement value of inductor is 3.99uH. However,customer has 3 board, one is 5V normal, the other two are abnormal, 1.7V and 3…
Part Number: TPS61071 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TINA-TI
Tool/software: WEBENCH® Design Tools
Hi
I want to simulate the optimal feed forward comp network for the TPS61071 booster.
I have exported the design from webench and trying to replicate…
Hello Harry
I assume that the red signal is VOUT. ——YES,The red line is the VMOT voltage signal of the LM51501-Q1
What is the blue signal? Is it the Status pin? ——The blue line is the switching voltage signal.
Why are you explicitly…
Part Number: TPS61071-Q1 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS61070 , TPS61073 , TPS61072 , , TPS61071 , TLV61220 Hello,
I need that up-converter for my application which is a PCB Mother Board which need to up convert 1.9v to 3.5v. It is a PCB which conected…
Part Number: TPS61071 My customer designed attached schematic file based on datasheet parameter P12 formula.
But output voltage shows slightly different against VOUT cal formula.
R1=R2×(Vo/VFB -1) //VFB=500mv
Would you please adivse how to adjust…
Part Number: TPS61071 Hi
Let me confirm the position of CparR1.
The customer uses R1=820K and R2=91K to get 5V output.
So CparR1 will be needed. Is it correct that the placement of CparR1 like below figure?
BestRegards
Hi Minqiu
Thank you for your previous support.
In the process of understanding the behavior of the TPS61071, I tried the TPS61073 from the same family.
With the same load and the exactly the same setup, the TPS61073 transient response is very difference…