Part Number: TPS628304 Tool/software: Hi,
I am planning to use this circuit in a power solution for a Versal circuit. Since some of the voltages are not drawing more the a few 100 mAs i want to use the 1 A version. But for some of the other voltages…
Part Number: TPS628301 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM2776 Tool/software: Hi,
First, please see the following URL. https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1427348/tps63700-replacement-for-lm2662m/547183…
Hi, There was no feedback since a while, so I assume this tread is resolved and can be closed. You can still reply to this thread after it is closed, or you can create a new thread. Best Regards, Andreas.
Part Number: TPS628301ADRLEVM Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS628301 Tool/software: Hello guys,
One of my customers wants to buy TPS628301 EVM.
But we could find TPS628301 EVM order page at TPS628301 product folder. Can we buy TPS628301 EVM at this moment…
Hi JDJ,
thanks for using E2E.
It is not possible to place a feedforward capacitor on TPS62843.
The TPS628301 has a pretty fast transient response but at a higher IQ.
Best regards,
Andreas.
Part Number: TPS62868 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS62860 , TPS628301 Tool/software: Hi Team,
I want to find a device, the spec requirement is as below:
Vin： 2.5V-4.5V
Vout: 0.2-2V
Load: below 0.5A
Package: the smaller, the better.
So do we have…
Hi Yongfei,
The TLV62568A won't be able to support more than 47uF output cap. Higher output cap causes the control loop to be unstable. Please use TPS628511, TPS628501 or TPS628301 to support larger output caps.
Best regards,
Varun
Hi Conor,
It should be ok to connect the EN pin to the PMIC's output. However this is a pretty old device. TPS628501, TPS628510 and TPS628301 are newer parts.
Best regards,
Varun
Hi Conor,
Thanks for reaching out.
I am afraid both TPS63700 and LMR70503 can't satisfy your requirement due to minimum input voltage is higher than 2.5V.
BTW, you can also use one LV Buck device as inverting buck-boost solution to get the negative…
Hi Ignacio,
A more safe and commonly used method is to have the LDO in series (in-between) the buck and your processor. The buck output can be regulated to about 100mV to 200mV more than what your processor requires. In this way the LDO will have enough…
