Hi
I am representing a major sensors provider for applications in the aerospace industry.
We have already assessed the behavior component in our environment and its accuracy performance and we would like to introduce it in our production.
We have a DO254 specification requirement and that standard defines some components families: simple, complex and highly complex.
When the component can be considered as simple, the DO254 is not applicable.
For example, if i choose a Texas analog to digital converter, it is considered as simple, the DO254 is not applicable and I can use it in an application where the DO254 is a requirement.
I understand that the component has not been designed to be DO254 compliant for avionics HW and SW. You have not the evidences which are requested when you follow a DO254 development.
Nevertheless, if I can prove that the PGA309 is simple, that would be possible to choose it and go ahead.
If the component was based on a microprocessor, the DO178 would be applicable (rejected for the application)
If the component was a FPGA, the DO254 would be applicable (rejected for the application)
Here, the component is a SOC and i haven’t details on the hardware of the PGA309, so i can’t classify it.
A first analysis regarding the PGA309 simple aspect could be based on its hardware architecture.
An important point is the table operating principle.
I can imagine that Texas has created a multiplier/adder to calculate the right gain and offset for a temperature measured (difficulty to create a divider).
Can you share something about the hardware structure ?
Thanks for your support
Chesneau Jean-françois