This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LM2903B: Lower Ibias than LM2903 (non-B)

Part Number: LM2903B
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM2903, LM2904

Hi team

LM2903B has lower Ibias than LM2904. Does it mean input impedance is higher than LM2903?

Customer concerns that high input impedance results in weaker against input noise. If above is correct, LM2903B is weaker than LM2903 in regards of noise at input signal, correct?

Best regards,

Hayashi

  • Hi Hayashi,

    the input bias current itself has nothing to do with the input impedance. The input impedance is the differential quotient (dU / dI) of input voltage change divided by input bias current change. See figures 6-21, 6-22 and 6-23 of datasheet. The "input impedance" at 25°C and 5V supply voltage can be estimated from figure 6-22 as

    Rin =  2.5V / (2.75nA - 2.25nA) = 5GOhm

    Keep in mind, though, that when having a bipolar comparator with such high input bias currents, where the input bias current is so much higher than the input bias current change with input voltage, datasheets do not talk in terms of input impedance but rather in terms of input bias currents. This is the reason why you do not find a specification of input impedance in this datasheet.

    Customer concerns that high input impedance results in weaker against input noise

    This is a widespread misunderstanding. If the input impedance is much higher than the source impedance, then it's mainly the source impedance what makes a circuit sensitive to noise. Or by other words, reducing the source impedance by a factor of 100 from 10k to 100R, as an example, improves the noise immunity much much more than decreasing the input impedance by a factor of 100 from 10G to 100M, if at all.

    Kai

  • Thank you Kai, that is very well said. 

    I hope this helps answer your questions, Hayashi.