Somewhere in the training sessions prepared by PA I thought I had seen this, but cannot find it now - any leads on where that might be? The one I recall was kind of like a THD power equation.
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Somewhere in the training sessions prepared by PA I thought I had seen this, but cannot find it now - any leads on where that might be? The one I recall was kind of like a THD power equation.
Michael,
There are several presentations on how amplifier selection impacts ADC THD and SNR. The presentations explain how to choose gain bandwidth and the proper RC charge bucket circuit for best THD and SNR. They are in https://www.ti.com/video/series/analog-to-digital-converters-adcs.html under the subsection entitled "Successive approximation register analog to digital converter input driver design".
I do remember an equation that translated INL to THD. There was some debate as to how accurate that equation was. I don't have the equation but will ask around and see if anyone knows it. Do you think this is the one you are looking for? Can you remember the variables that the equation took into account?
Art
Michael,
I sent an email to the PADC team to see if anyone remembers or has this content. We don't have an on-line archive of tech days, but if you can remember the title I can find it.
Art
I found an example in here on page 43. This is of course incorrect as we later got bench results showing they added in phase, this is a power addition implying they are in quadrature - but why should they be?
https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/bitstream/handle/2346/19997/31295017115493.pdf?sequence=1
Michael,
Thanks for posting the material. It looks like good content.
Art
Oh and Art, another piece I am putting into this article is relatively recent bench verification that the HD terms add in phase for cascaded stages. I took that data on the 2stage THS3217 - 1st seperately then cascaded, I would say this equation is working pretty well,
The math combining two cascaded stages for each distortion term is shown as Eq. 1.
Eq. 1
This is written as SFDR, but actually the HD2 and HD3 (etc) terms would be combined individually. Legacy literature would often report the combination as a THD power combination as in Eq. 2, which is totally incorrect, (page 43, ref. 3).
Eq. 2
Much more recent bench testing of a 2-stage amplifier (THS3217), where the input and output stages were measured separately, then combined in cascaded stages, showed these same results (Fig. 4). Here the input D2S stage was tested over frequency with a 2Vpp into 200ohm load while the OPS stage in that same unit was tested separately producing 5Vpp into 100ohm load. These separate measurements were combined using Eq. 1 to predict the cascaded distortion then the same part was measured in a cascaded configuration producing the same swings and loading at each stage. Clearly Eq. 1 appears to correctly combine the cascaded distortion performance.
Figure 4. Calculated and measured two stage amplifier distortion comparison.