Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA140, TINA-TI
I believe I am seeing incorrect noise behavior from the OPA347 model in TINA.
I started by using the SPICE model for this (OPA347.lib) and importing into LTSpice, which I am more familiar with than TINA. This gave me incorrect results (flat noise at the wrong broadband level, with no 1/f rollup). I then tried this with the OPA140 model (OPAx140.lib) and got similarly strange results, so I figured I would give TINA a try.
Once I set things up in TINA, I modeled each of these parts in unity gain buffer configuration with 0-ohm source resistance. The OPA140 gave me the expected result as compared to the datasheet. The OPA347 gave me the same apparently wrong result I got in LTSpice. See screenshots of both alongside datasheet vnoise spectra in each case attached.
I therefore have two questions:
1) Is the OPA347 model wrong? If not, why is it producing results inconsistent with the datasheet?
2) In general, can I not expect to use the .lib SPICE models you provide with the LTSpice tool? If I should be able to, do you know why I might be getting incorrect results when I try that, even with the OPAx140 model that seems to be correct?
Thanks,
Zach




