This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LMC6081: Input bias current specification SOIC package

Part Number: LMC6081
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA928

Hi there,

the datasheet lists a maximum input bias current for of the LMC6081AIM (SOIC package) of 100 pA, and for the versions in a PDIP package of 4 pA. The column with the typical parameters does not distinguish between the packages, neither does Figure 6 Input Bias Current vs Temperature.

So the question is whether there really is a difference between packages or whether this is just a testing limit. In case there is a difference, is it correct to assume that the typical input bias current is also a factor 25 higher for the SOIC package compared to the PDIP package. 

Since the PDIP package version has a current status of LIFEBUY it's not an option to use it, because this is for a new design.

Best regards,
Klaus

  • As far as I can see, there are no differences between the packages; "LMC6081AM" refers to the LMC6081-MIL, which is tested for higher temperatures.

  • OK, this sounds good. How does one know though, that LMC6081AM refers to the MIL version? In the orderable parts section of the (latest) datasheet the letter M seems to designate PDIP instead of SOIC (Letter N).  The LMC6081-MIL product page on ti.com lists "DIESALE" as the only available option, which again according to the datasheet has the designation LMC6081-MDA - not LMC6081AM. I find this quite confusing ...

  • LMC6081AM temperature range is from -55C to 125C while for LMC6081AI from -40C to 85C - see below.  Since the leakage current roughly doubles every 10 deg C, increasing the maximum temperature from 85C to 125 C (by 40 deg C) results in IB increase by the factor of 2^(40C/10C)=16 (this is main reason behind 4pA vs 100pA max IB). Having said that for any new design I would recommend to use OPA928.

  • OK, that makes sense. Thanks for the clarification. I missed the difference in temperature specification for the AM vs. (A)I parts. I did actually look into the OPA928 and agree that it would fit my application much better. However, it is in preview only and I need to do prototyping now. Bad timing I guess ... 

  • Klaus,

    You may order pre-production samples of OPA928 by using following link: https://www.ti.com/product/OPA928#order-quality