I'm getting unusual results when trying to use the TLV342 Spice model in TINA-TI V9. Can someone at TI confirm whether or not there is a problem with this model?
Thanks.
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello John,
I have not seen any (other) complaints about the model.
What is the issue and which model did you use Pspice or Tina-TI spice?
Regards,
Ron Michallick
Neil,
The model is for a dual op amp, so the standard op amp triangle symbol can not be used.
Do you have a suggestion for an alternate symbol?
Regards,
Ron Michallick
Ron;
You must not be very familiar with TINA-TI. The TINA op amp macromodels are written for single devices and the user places two standard triangle symbols on his schematic to represent a dual op amp (changing the designation from an OPAxxx to an OPA2xxxA and OPA2xxxB). A quad op amp is treated similarly.
If you have used TINA much, you will have noticed that the single, dual, and quad op amps all have a standard triangle symbol-- except for the ones that TI produced with the supply pins in the wrong positions or the ones drawn upside down.....more shoddy work. Is nobody managing and coordinating this effort?