This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

OPA333-Q1: Design Considerations for Wireless Expansion Modules (e.g., Wi-Fi/Bluetooth) – Best Practices?

Part Number: OPA333-Q1

Tool/software:

Hello TI Community,

I’m exploring the integration of a wireless expansion module (Wi-Fi/Bluetooth/BLE) into an embedded system based on a TI SoC (e.g., Sitara or SimpleLink). My goal is to enable reliable IoT connectivity with low power consumption and minimal footprint.

Key Questions:

  1. Module Selection: Are there TI-recommended wireless modules (e.g., CC3xxx series) that pair seamlessly with TI processors for plug-and-play designs? Any trade-offs between integrated vs. external modules?

  2. Antenna Design: For FCC/CE compliance, what antenna layouts or reference designs (PCB vs. external) are proven to work with TI’s wireless stacks?

  3. Power Management: How can I optimize power when using a wireless expansion module in battery-operated devices? Are there specific TI PMICs or software tricks (e.g., duty cycling) to extend battery life?

  4. Interference Mitigation: In a multi-radio system (e.g., Wi-Fi + BLE), what hardware/software strategies does TI suggest to reduce coexistence issues?

Context:

  • Target Applications: Industrial IoT sensors, wearable devices.

  • Constraints: Cost-sensitive, compact form factor, and need for FCC certification.

I’d appreciate any insights from TI experts or engineers who’ve tackled similar challenges. Datasheets, app notes, or war stories would be invaluable!

Thanks in advance.

  • Jack,

    LAMPS-LVAC product line support only low voltage op amps and comparators.  Thus, you need to contact TI wireless support team like Sitara or SimpleLink to answer your questions regarding wireless modules, FCC compliance, antenna design and/or interference mitigation.