Part Number: INA303
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA835, , DRV8311, INA301, INA181
Tool/software:
I'm trying to muddle my way through my first design with a motor driver that includes current sensing. This is for a battery-powered device, operating at 3.3v. My motor is a small gimbal-style motor, which I intend to run at 3.3v, and which I estimate will draw current ranging from 0.1-0.4A. I think I would like to run at a PWM that is at least 20kHz, though it would be nice to go faster to avoid switching frequencies that might be irritating to pets. Maybe that's 25-40kHz (center-aligned PWM)?
I have been consuming a ton of TI informational material to try to wrap my head around how to design the ADC front end amplification stage for low-side three-shunt current sensing. In particular, I found this paper to be quite informative:
https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/tiducy7/tiducy7.pdf
However, something that is not clear to me is why two different parts (the OPA835 and the INA303) are specified in this design. I'm curious if anyone may be able to elaborate for me? Like, why wouldn't I just choose three OPA835s in the case of a three-shunt design?
Something I notice about the INA303 is that it has an IQ that seems high for a battery-powered device. I am curious if there may be a more appropriate choice for a low-power design? I'm afraid - because I'm still in the learning phase with this - that I am not yet well-equipped to know what parameters to optimize for when searching parts for this use case.
(I am familiar with the DRV8311, and that it integrates this functionality within the device. That's pretty appealing, but I'm curious about exploring lower-power options, and also just interested in learning how to critically think about this).
Thank you!
