• State TI Thinks Resolved
  • Replies 10 replies
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 46 subscribers
  • Views 123 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

INA226-Q1: Part marking

cesar cardenas
Prodigy 30 points

Part Number: INA226-Q1

Hi TI team

We have a doubt regarding part marking for component  INA226AQDGSRQ1  wichone shows in data sheet it should be 226Q but component marking shows 226 as show below picture

 

image.png

 

 

  • 0
    TI__Mastermind 36510 points

    Hi,

    The marking appears to be commercial grade.

    Looks to me, there is a discrepancy between the packing label and the device marking. I’ll work to find out what happened, and report back. There was a recent change in the flow and it is possible that the device is Q1 grade, yet missed the “Q” mark.  

    Regards

    Guang

  • 0 in reply to Guang Zhou
    Prodigy 30 points

    Hi Gung 

    In case of was marking error could you help me to check if all the material that we received under below invoice/PO has the same issue??

    In case of was a marking error TI can issue a letter where confirm that material is automotive grade.

  • 0 in reply to cesar cardenas
    TI__Mastermind 36510 points

    Hi Cesar,

    I’m working with colleagues on the production side to sort out things. This likely will take us to next week. However I’ll report any findings if they become available.

    Regards

    Guang

  • 0 in reply to Guang Zhou
    Prodigy 30 points

    Guang

    We can understand that it will take time to validate the information with the factory, but this issue will apply charges to IT due we have material on stopped waiting for response if it´s correct or not.

  • 0 in reply to cesar cardenas
    Prodigy 30 points

    Guang

    Do you have some update for this topic??  material is on hold waiting for TI response if it meets automotive garde, charges for this issue will be applied 

  • 0 in reply to cesar cardenas
    TI__Mastermind 36510 points

    Hi Cesar,

    Can you confirm if a desiccant was included in the packing bag of this material?

    We can confirm that this material is auto grade. Because the material was produced using SWR (special work request), rather than through normal production flow, some paperwork mistakes were made, such as the top marking.

    The confirmation whether a desiccant was included will help confirm further if the production process was followed completely.

    Regards

    Guang

  • 0 in reply to Guang Zhou
    Prodigy 30 points

    Guang

    Unfortunately, i can´t confirm if dissecans was there because material was used on production, please provide us confirmation letter where TI confirm that material meet auto grade.

  • 0 in reply to cesar cardenas
    TI__Mastermind 36510 points

    Hi Cesar,

    Yes, I can confirm that the material is auto grade.

    The reason I asked the question about the desiccant is it was not mentioned in the SWR. However the chance of a mistake here should be slim. As the MSL was specified, operations should have followed the proper procedure.

    Based on our findings, you should be able to continue production with this material.

    Regards

    Guang

  • 0 in reply to Guang Zhou
    Prodigy 30 points

    Hi Guan 

    We need 8D report with corrective and preventive actions as well as charges for line down will be applied, please let me know how we can submit the line down cost once I get it from my team.

  • 0 in reply to cesar cardenas
    TI__Mastermind 36510 points

    Hi Cesar,

    Not a problem. I’m not clear myself on the proper channel for request submission, I’ll research into it and let you know once I find out.

    Regards

    Guang