OPA548: Ripple generator

Part Number: OPA548

Hi,
I need to test an electronic module for automotive application (12V) and would like to evaluate the behavior on the bench under sine ripple from few Hz up 200kHz, up to 6Vpp. As far as I could see, OPA548 could solve this problem. Is there any recomendation to add such signal to a 14Vdc line?

  • Hi Iannis, 

    Welcome to the E2E forum, and thanks for reaching out. 

    I think you are on the right path, OPA548 is likely an ideal candidate for this type of use-case. 

    A few questions. So we are trying to couple this varied frequency, varied amplitude sine wave onto a fixed 14V DC line?  

    What is the load that the amplifier will be driving? Do you want the amplifier to provide this 14V DC line as well as the AC? 

    Do you have an expected supply voltage that you will have access to? 

    What provides the AC to the OPA? 

    A lot of questions, but this will all help me understand the application a bit better Slight smile

    Thanks,

    Jacob

  • The DC supply will be done by an external power supply where I can adjust the correct voltage. The current will be around 1A but I would like to assemble something up to 3A for future needs. The test will be performed with fixed output amplitude, but there are different steps. 15Hz up to 30kHz with 2Vpp, 3Vpp and 6Vpp, and finallly 1Vpp from 30kHz up to 200kHz. The AC source will be a signal generator IC, AD9833.

  • Hi Iannis, 

    Gotcha, thanks for the details. 

    OPA548 is likely the preferred device for the current ranges you mention. 

    I see there being two primary options:

    1. The method we discussed earlier, using a bias T to couple the AC wave from the power OPA onto the existing DC source. The advantage of this solution is that the DC power does not source from the power OPA, so this can be beneficial depending on steady state loading conditions. The method however requires the LC network to be optimized for the desired frequency and, in this case we would need to set a pretty low frequency HPF.

    2. We could alternatively use a summing amplifier or inverting amplifier to create the DC + AC wave. The disadvantage here is that the DC power now comes from the OPA supply rail, so we could potentially see large power losses depending on the setup. The advantage however is that we can avoid LC networks, and create accurate DC and AC amplitude over frequency. 

    The frequency and amplitude ranges you mention are all reasonable for OPA548. 

    Personally, I prefer option 2 as this is the method we often use for creating PSRR testers. Again, this however depends heavily on the DC current consumption of your design. 

    Thanks,

    Jacob

  • Ok. I see #2 as preferred one also. Have you ever seen a topology like this? I mean, instead of designing the complete circuit, use what is ready. Current consumption is about 1A, but if it supports up to 3A, will have some addition room for the future.