This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Was It Necessary to Vandalize the OPA277 TINA Symbol?

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA277, TINA-TI

Opening the OPA277 TINA-TI reference circuit revealed a circuit that was virtually unrecognizable-- the previous op amp symbol, which was the same standard symbol used in all the TI/BB op amps has been replaced with a non-standard  symbol that has now sprouted trim pins! The size of the new symbol is not compatible with TINA-TI circuits using the standard symbols so it is tedious to have to re-draw the circuit to accommodate this new OPA277 symbol. It is bad enough having to deal with some TI high-speed op amps that are drawn upside-down.

In addition, the reference circuit has been replaced by a circuit that looks like it was cobbled together by a beginner. Was this necessary? Improvements I can understand but this? I have attached the original OPA277 reference circuit (found in the TINA-TI "Examples" - "TI Test Circuits" - "OPA277 Test Circuit.TSC")

Open the one on the current TI OPA277 page and compare the two. Is anyone at TI paying attention to things like this?

 

OPA277 Test Circuit.TSC
  • Neil,

    We are all in agreement that we should be using our standard op amp symbol for all macro-models and we do just that for all new op amps.  OPA277 non-standard symbol is a result of misunderstanding between us and another team working on a backlog of old legacy products with inadequate models.  W have been aware of this issue for some time and are working on fixing the problem.

  • Thanks, Marek. I know that no old Burr-Brown people would allow that to happen.

    It sounds as if TI is running open-loop; no manager is coordinating the TINA-TI effort.